![]() ![]() ‘Most of the bodies we see online on a daily basis aren’t even real, but rather enhanced or modified by technology to conform to a current, unsustainable trend,’ says LA-based photographer Julia SH, who is exhibiting powerful, textured portraits of bodies rarely depicted in 21st-century media, presented in museum-like frames.īut under this flawless skin is a rotten deception, one deepened by a social-media saturated society. ‘In the US, what little nudity permitted is usually shown in a sexual context. ![]() Seeing nudes in a museum is one of the only exceptions to this. I created a series where I framed my models as sculptures and works of art in the hope that the viewer will suspend any judgments about whether they find the models sexually attractive or not, or whether their bodies are socially “acceptable”. The more body types we are exposed to, the more pragmatic our view will become.’įrench-Uruguayan photographer Bettina Pittaluga’s work in ‘Nude’ focuses on physical intimacy, which, as the artist explains, ‘can be revealed by being in someone’s personal space, or bonding through physical contact, by skinship. What interests me nudity, from a pictorial and emotional point of view, is the expression of the skin. It necessarily involves the other senses because it is impossible not to see, hear and smell people when you are close enough to touch them.’īut why does Pittaluga think it's important for contemporary photography to offer visibility to all body types? ‘I hope that one day this kind of question will no longer exist,’ she says. 25, X’s Safety team said the company was “actively removing” all identified images of nonconsensual nudity, which it said is “strictly prohibited” on the platform.‘I am focused on giving a voice and visibility to those who are not or too little represented. 24, generating more than 27 million views in 19 hours before the account that originally posted the images was suspended, NBC News reported. Sexually explicit deepfakes of Swift went viral on X on Wednesday, Jan. Asked if President Biden would support legislation making such AI-generated porn illegal, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre responded, “We are alarmed by the reports of the circulation of images that you just laid out… There should be legislation, obviously, to deal with this issue.” No more downloading images only to discover they’re not what you were looking for. Image Preview: The extension goes the extra mile by letting you preview images in a new tab. The White House also weighed in on the issue. ImageZilla offers filters that allow you to download images by extension, making it incredibly convenient to find images in the format you desire. On Friday, SAG-AFTRA issued a statement condemning the Swift fake images as “upsetting, harmful and deeply concerning” and said “the development and dissemination of fake images - especially those of a lewd nature - without someone’s consent must be made illegal.” Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, in an interview with NBC News, called the fake Swift porn images “alarming and terrible” and said that “we have to act” and that “irrespective of what your standing on any particular issue is I think we all benefit when the online world is a safe world.” ![]() The move came several days after sexually explicit AI-generated images of Swift went viral across X, as well as other internet platforms. Regarding the change to block searches for Taylor Swift, X head of business operations Joe Benarroch said in a statement, “This is a temporary action and done with an abundance of caution as we prioritize safety on this issue.” (2 minutes) It could eventually be a federal crime to share digitally-altered nude images of real people. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |